What did the Supreme Court decide in the case of Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978 )?

Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.

What did the Supreme Court say in its ruling in Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978 )? 2 points?

In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.

FASCINATINGLY:  How fast is rush shipping for SAT scores?

What did the Supreme Court say in its ruling in Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978 )? Quizlet?

In Regents of University of California v. Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances.

What was the result of Regents of the University of California v Bakke?

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a 1978 Supreme Court case which held that a university’s admissions criteria which used race as a definite and exclusive basis for an admission decision violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

How did the Supreme Court rule in the case of Grutter v Bollinger quizlet?

Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court ruled that the use of affirmative action in school admission is constitutional if it treats race as one factor among many, its purpose is to achieve a “diverse” class, and it does not substitute for individualized review of applicant, but is unconstitutional if it automatically …

How did the decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke affect individual rights?

How did the decision in Regents v. Bakke affect individual rights? It limited rights by giving all minorities higher priority.

What did the Supreme Court decide in Vernonia v Acton quizlet?

Acton, (1995) was a U.S. Supreme Court decision which upheld the constitutionality of random drug testing regimen implemented by the local public schools in Vernonia, Oregon. Under that regimen, student athletes were required to submit to random drug testing before being allowed to participate in sports.

FASCINATINGLY:  What college is the Devils?

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Plessy v Ferguson?

Ferguson, Judgement, Decided May 18, 1896; Records of the Supreme Court of the United States; Record Group 267; Plessy v. Ferguson, 163, #15248, National Archives. The ruling in this Supreme Court case upheld a Louisiana state law that allowed for “equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races.”

What was the outcome of the Court case Obergefell V Hodges quizlet?

Terms in this set (18)

Obergefell v Hodges is the Supreme Court case where it was ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause.

Why was the regents of the University of California v Bakke importance?

Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy.

What is the significance of the Hopwood v Texas Court decision?

Texas was a case ruled upon by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in 1996. The appeals court held that the University of Texas School of Law could not use race as a factor in determining which applicants to admit to the university.

What was the significance of the Bakke decision and the University of Michigan cases?

What was the significance of the Bakke decision and the University of Michigan cases? They forbade the use of racial quotas in school admissions, but allowed some consideration of race in admissions decisions. Slavery was prohibited by the Nineteenth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution.

FASCINATINGLY:  You asked: How long is early college?

What was the Supreme Court decision in Grutter v Bollinger?

Bollinger, a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 23, 2003, upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School. The decision permitted the use of racial preference in student admissions to promote student diversity.

What was the decision of Grutter v Bollinger?

Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court ruled that the use of affirmative action in school admission is constitutional if it treats race as one factor among many, its purpose is to achieve a “diverse” class, and it does not substitute for individualized review of applicant, but is unconstitutional if it automatically …

What did the Supreme Court decide in Korematsu v US 1944 regarding the internment of American citizens of Japanese ancestry living in the United States quizlet?

What did the Supreme Court decide in Korematsu v. United States (1944) regarding the internment of those with Japanese ancestry living in the United States? … Supreme Court decided that public discrimination could not be prohibited by the act because such discrimination was private, not a state act.